Since the United States Patent & Trade Office opened in 1790, it has required that every patent be accompanied by an illustration depicting the applicant’s invention. But in the past 222 years, patent drawings have changed, degrading from detailed works of art to simplistic line drawings that barely qualify as illustrations.

Whereas patent drawings from the 1800s and even early- to mid-1900s featured artistic techniques like shading, multiple perspectives and texture, today’s patent drawings are often embarrassing doodles at best. We can blame both cultural changes and adjustments in patent application rules. For one, the patent office no longer requires that patent applicants hire an official draftsman to draw an invention. And in 2000, the PTO adjusted its rules to decrease how often applicants need to revise their drawings with corrections.

Specifically, the Patent Office decided that it would “focus on having a drawing that can communicate the invention to the examiner and on the scanability of the drawings so as to produce readable drawings in published applications and patents.” So, while a modern drawing does have to explain an invention, it doesn’t have to do so in an especially beautiful way.

More on the history (and de-evolution of) patent drawings @ Gadget Lab.

(Source: Wired)

  1. timenotfound reblogged this from wired
  2. cuntzpunce reblogged this from wired
  3. valkyrierisen reblogged this from wired and added:
    Bring back official drafts-people. Please.
  4. hellzironchef reblogged this from wired and added:
    one would think that technology would make it easier to draw out your patents, huh
  5. talesofasoutherngentleman reblogged this from wired
  6. 42disney reblogged this from wired
  7. hopeisforpeople reblogged this from wired
  8. arielzambelich reblogged this from wired
  9. riceagainst reblogged this from wired
  10. theoriginalsnub reblogged this from wired
  11. gamma-fief reblogged this from wired
  12. wired posted this